Prev: RE: [ds, sg] tech and scratchbuild questions Next: Re: Slow planes was: Battle blimps

Re: [ds, sg] tech and scratchbuild questions

From: Robert Makowsky <rmakowsky@y...>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 13:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [ds, sg] tech and scratchbuild questions

I agree that standardization is important for just the
reasons you list.  

However, innovative use of the tech by the users may
result in settings that work but were not found in
testing.  

Not the best idea again for the reasons below but
worth some study from a group who is in action and not
just testing.

Magic

--- Roger Books <books@jumpspace.net> wrote:
> On 18-Apr-02 at 07:16, Robert Makowsky
> (rmakowsky@yahoo.com) wrote:
> 
> > It would take a very enlightened military to allow
> the
> > individual to choose what works best for them. 
> *Heavy
> > but true sarcasm here*
> 
> Do you know how many stupid, worthless, inaffective
> settings
> your users would pick if allowed to chose their
> view?  It
> would work great right up until the bozo on watch
> with the
> strobe setting got everyone killed.  I'd much rather
> have
> everyone at 100% than 5 guys at 103% and one guy at
> 30%.
> 
> Roger Books

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax


Prev: RE: [ds, sg] tech and scratchbuild questions Next: Re: Slow planes was: Battle blimps