Re: Battle blimps
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 18:50:34 -0400
Subject: Re: Battle blimps
At 6:18 PM -0700 4/16/02, Michael Llaneza wrote:
>And a 747 is pretty small compared to what an airship can
>accomodate. The tone is the sort of "forward-looking statement" that
>the SEC puts people in jail for. But 20 years from now something
>like that may even be plausible. An airship with a couple of air
>defense lasers sitting at 20 miles altitude can cover a lot of
>territory and sweep the skies clear, and be impervious to anything
>in the air. Considering that, I can see value in pursuing very
>radical studies.
I've been a bit busy with work here.. but the gondola on blimps and
the volume of non equipment space is pretty disparate. The gondola on
a typical blimp is probably small enough to fit inside of a C130 and
leave more room for the air bag and other support gear.
Granted, total volume of the Blimp vs a 747 is pretty similar, but
the Blimp is mostly puffed air. Being able to have the same cargo
weight as a 747, would make it a massive airship. Probably on the
scale of the larger rigids of the interwar years.
--
--
Ryan Gill rmgill@mindspring.com
| |
| O--=- | | |
|_/|o|_\_| | _________ |
/ 00DA61 \ |/---------\|
_w/^=_[__]_= \w_ // [_] o[]\\
|: O(4) == O :| _Oo\=======/_O_
|---\________/---| [__O_______W__]
|~|\ /|~| |~|/BSV 575\|~|
|~|=\______/=|~| |~|=|_____|=|~|
|~| |~| |~| |~|