Prev: RE: [MERCS] Weapons available [FH] Next: Re: [SG2) Decals

Re: Quick question on GMS

From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 17:53:15 EDT
Subject: Re: Quick question on GMS



On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 11:11:43 -0700 "Brian Bilderback"
<bbilderback@hotmail.com> writes:
>Is it plausible that a GMS should:
>
>A) On one hand have an easier time hitting a target at middle ranges 
>than at 
>short range, since it has more time to home in on the target;
>

Definitive non-expert opinion.	No, more time for EW and CM to work plus
target movement?

>B) on the other hand be easier for ADS to take out the further it has 
>to 
>pass through an ADS' zone of fire, since the ADS _ALSO_ gets longer to 
>lock 
>in on it?
>
>3B^2

I rather have the impression that currently this kind of thing is
decided
in what Winston Churchill referred to as "The Wizard War" aspect of
computers/electronics (or some such quote) and might occur far too fast
for the slight range variance to have much affect in DS2 Granularity. 
SG
II?  No opinion.  Oh, also there is (maybe?) the time between launch and
weapon arming where the missile might be guaranteed a "hit" but no
"boom"
factor.

Rambling without technical expertise - - - - 

Gracias,
Glenn/Triphibious@juno.com
This is my Science Fiction Alter Ego E-mail address.
Historical - Warbeads@juno.com
Fantasy and 6mm - dwarf_warrior@juno.com

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:


Prev: RE: [MERCS] Weapons available [FH] Next: Re: [SG2) Decals