Prev: Re: [DS, SG] Sources of WWI tanks and knights Next: Re: [DS, SG] Sources of WWI tanks and knights

Re: [DS] Capacity, Points - Trying to put it all together. Long post.

From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 22:52:39 EDT
Subject: Re: [DS] Capacity, Points - Trying to put it all together. Long post.

Welcome to Tractics, no thanks!

On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 19:02:46 +1000 "Alan and Carmel Brain"
<aebrain@webone.com.au> writes:
>From: "Indy" <kochte@stsci.edu>
>
>> And I would like to try working with designs based on
>> contemporary high-tech tanks (such as Oerjan's estimation of
>> their having 8/2/1 front/side/rear armour values). 
>
>8/2/1 is a reasonable approximation.
>
>Note that the side armour when hit at angles of attack of 60' and
>more has an effective strength more like 8 than 2. A reasonable
>(though not strictly accurate) approximation is that all attacks
>coming through the forward 90' arc hit frontal armour. A better
>approximation is that all attacks coming through the frontal
>60' hit frontal armour, BUT you must take into account the angle
>of attack vs the turret, not just the hull.

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:


Prev: Re: [DS, SG] Sources of WWI tanks and knights Next: Re: [DS, SG] Sources of WWI tanks and knights