Prev: Re: DS3 points | Next: Australia spurs another base for a scenario |
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 12:58:38 -0500, Ryan Gill <rmgill@mindspring.com>
wrote :
> >
> >Using Andy Cowell's on-line DSII generator, the costs for the
> >sample tanks are 64 points for Vehicle A, and 138 points for
> >Vehicle B
>
> And if vehicle B has an enhanced PDS, a ECM system, ADFV and
> additional components filling in that space, then shouldn't it still
> be more than vehicle A?
It should indeed, but if Vehicle A is also upgraded, and performance
qualities remain identical, should they not cost the same?
> >...which illustrates the point nicely, I think. Two vehicles with
> >identical performance, but one costs a little more than *twice* as
> >much as the other.
>
> Because the assumption is that if you build a vehicle with additional
> capacity, it will be used. You're leaving this big empty box on the
> back of this tank and saying it doesn't have a combat value. Thats
> true. But if you stuff additional components into that tank then
> you've got a better tank.
Who's saying that that extra space isn't used? Maybe the Infamous
Cowards of Glaxion VI *need* that extra space -- they're claustrophobes,
you see,
and can't stand being in to tight of an area.... It's a fluff thing.
But in any case, you are saying that Vehicle B should cost more because
it has the *potential* to be more heaily armed? Potential shouldn't
really enter
into it, I think. Performance on the board is all that really matters.
> Now, I would approach all of this from a different direction. I'd
> build a cost system in that would allow miniaturization of types of
> weapons making them take up lower amounts of capacity for a given
> cost. It builds on the system and allows you to get what you are
> looking for.
>
> I have a problem with the fact that you're squishing two things
> together and saying they are the same when they are not. Size =!
> apparent signature.
You lose me here -- does "=!" mean "is not equal to"?
Even assuming that, frankly, you've still lost me. Please to explain?
Use small words...it's a Friday, and I'm all giddy.
--
John Crimmins
johncrim@voicenet.com
Prev: Re: DS3 points | Next: Australia spurs another base for a scenario |