Re: FTL "Warp Surfing" Drive
From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:34:00 -0800
Subject: Re: FTL "Warp Surfing" Drive
Randy W. Wolfmeyer wrote:
> > Makes sense. It would also stand to reason then that you would have
to
>plot
> > FTL courses that avoided any significant mass en route, no?
>
>That's not too hard, space is really big.
Not hard, but necessary. That was my only point.
You'd probably plan your trip
>in limited distance runs, stopping every so often to check that you're
on
>course, making corrections and then go again.
Yep, that's what i figured, and it fits nicely into the type of
campaigns I
like to run. :-)
><< means MUCH less than, and >> means MUCH greater than.
Duh. Was it really that simple? Now I REALLY feel dumb.
>Usually in
>physics we use these symbols to mean that we can ignore certain
variables.
Can you illustrate that point?
>How much greater or lesser than it has to be to use these symbols
depends
>on the problem you're dealing with.
That makes sense.
> > I'd actually prefer to remain MUCH farther than that from any black
>holes,
> > for good, thank you. ;-)
>
>See you've got it: d >> black hole diameter.
That's not me doing good math, that's intuitive survival instinct. ;-)
3B^2
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.