Prev: Re: [SG] David's KraVak rules Next: RE: Librarians, was RE: [SG] HAMR

Re: [SG] David's KraVak rules

From: "Alan and Carmel Brain" <aebrain@w...>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 21:20:10 +1100
Subject: Re: [SG] David's KraVak rules

From: "Tony Francis" <tony.francis@kuju.com>

> Style sheets ? You could change the look of the whole site by
uploading
> one new file.

Especially to those using Netscape, who may see blank pages as the
result.
CSS = Standard. Standard == Good. But not if the standard isn't actually
implemented by a large slice of the audience.

Hate to say it, but Internet Exploder 5+ is actually more compliant to
the
w3.org's recomendations than Netscape 6.2+. Shame. I hate saying
anything
good about any really crappy product (ie any of them) from the
scumsucking


Prev: Re: [SG] David's KraVak rules Next: RE: Librarians, was RE: [SG] HAMR