RE: HAMR time
From: "Bob Makowsky" <rmakowsky@y...>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 19:26:59 -0400
Subject: RE: HAMR time
Definitely warrants a reduction in movement in my book then.
Magic
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> [mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of John Atkinson
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:12 AM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: HAMR time
>
>
>
> --- Tomb <tomb@dreammechanics.com> wrote:
>
> > [Tomb] Why yes. The penalties are identical. None.
> >
> > [Tomb] Now, you could, if you were inclined,
> > consider the guy lugging
> > the HAMR (if by himself) to be encumbered. That
> > wouldn't be what one
> > would do for the average SAW (think Minimi/M249 -
> > not _that_
> > encumbering!). But the HAMR is monsterous enough to
> > make a one-person
> > lug rather unwieldy (and hence merit a reduction in
> > movement).
>
> I would. An M-249 with bipod and tools weighs 7.718
> kg (17.00 lbs). 200 round box magazine weighs 3.14 kg
> (6.92 lbs). Spare heat shield, spare barrel assembly,
> and barrel bag weighs 3.178 kg (7 lbs). So a SAW
> gunner with a combat load of 600 rounds is carrying a
> total of 29.598 kg (44.76 lbs) Source is the
> operator's manual for said weapon.
>
> The Barrett .50 cal M82A1 weighs much more --12.9 kg
> (28.5 lbs). And that's just the rifle (according to
> http://www.barrettrifles.com/rifles.html). Ammunition
> is heavy as hell also. I can't find the numbers right
> now, but a magazine of 10 rounds is probably about 2/3
> the weight of the SAW magazines.
>
> But wait, there's more! The overall length of the
> M-249 is 1.35m (40.75"). Pretty handy, and there's a
> collapsible stock version that's even shorter. The
> Barrett is 1.4478m, a total of 57". IOW, nearly 5
> feet long.
>
>
> John
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
> http://sports.yahoo.com/
>
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?