Re: [FT] Updated MT Missiles question

----- Original Message -----
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@telia.com>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:31 PM
Subject: Re: [FT] Updated MT Missiles question

> Charles Taylor wrote:
>
> >The revised rules covered MT missiles, and MT EMP missiles, but not
MT
> >Needle Missiles:
>
> That's correct, and it is deliberate. Unless you can pack in a
full-sized
> FCS into the missile in addition to its drive and warhead, the missile
> doesn't have good enough sensors to pick out a specific target system.
>
> Later,
>
> Oerjan
> oerjan.ohlson@telia.com
>
> "Life is like a sewer.
>   What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
> -Hen3ry
>
>

How about for these we take a idea from starfire, and have a simple list
of
the systems mounted on said target in a line at the bottom of the sheet,
and
the sucessful needle beam attack destroys a random system? This would
also
work for random EMP type weapons (or weapons that don`t attack all
systems,
just specific ones). This could also be used agaist normal needle beams
(ship mounted ones) agaist a target protected by ECM, that would prevent
you
from getting a proper "lock on/scan" to hit a selected target.