Prev: Re: RE: [FT] Orbit and FT Next: RE: RE: [FT] Orbit and FT

RE: RE: [FT] Orbit and FT

From: "B Lin" <lin@r...>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 14:26:52 -0700
Subject: RE: RE: [FT] Orbit and FT

Just look at the Harrier II...

--Binhan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: K.H.Ranitzsch [mailto:KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 2:04 PM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: RE: [FT] Orbit and FT
> 
> the gravity would be my first guess.
> 
> It's perfectly feasible with present-day thrust technology. 
> Any modern Jet
> fighter has more thrust than mass. You could station one of 
> them hovering
> over a pole
> and burn a hole in the ice there (at least until the fuel 
> runs out, and
> assuming a good autopilot).
> 
> Greetings
> Karl Heinz
> 
> 


Prev: Re: RE: [FT] Orbit and FT Next: RE: RE: [FT] Orbit and FT