Prev: RE: [FT] Orbit and FT Next: RE: [FT] Orbit and FT

Re: Gyrobombs

From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:46:21 +0100
Subject: Re: Gyrobombs


----- Original Message -----
From: <laserlight@quixnet.net>

> From: Roger Burton West
> >Gyrobombs!
> >With sufficient materials tech, you can get more energy per mass in a
> spinning gyroscope than in any current chemical explosive.
>
> What do you mean by "sufficient materials tech"?  Unobtainium?  Carbon
fibers?  Lead?

Present-day carbon-fiber/galss flywheels can pack enough energy in a
compact
enough space to be considered as an option for energy storage in cars or
house. Better than most batteries, but less than chemical fuels at teh
moment.

I think an anti-personnel mine could be produced today. Main problems
would
be initial energy.supply and bearings that run for long enough. And it's
untested.

Greetings


Prev: RE: [FT] Orbit and FT Next: RE: [FT] Orbit and FT