Prev: Re: [OT]Nukes... tunnels.... boom.... Next: Re: Gyrobombs

Re: FT: Carriers

From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:38:33 -0800
Subject: Re: FT: Carriers

Karl Heinz Wrote:

>Possible, but not strictly neccessary. Not that the Space Shuttle
>decelerates with its main engines facing forward in the direction of
>movement. After the burning, there is enough time to rotate to fly nose
>forward before reentry.

I was not aware.... thanks....

I guess it depends on what is more of a problem: the
>extra complexity of rotating catapult cradles or the extra fuel aboard
a
>fighter.

And PSB-wise, that's a matter of which necessitates a cooler-looking 
solution.

2B^2

_________________________________________________________________


Prev: Re: [OT]Nukes... tunnels.... boom.... Next: Re: Gyrobombs