Prev: Re: Re-entry: was FT: Carriers Next: [GZG-ECC] AARs now posted

RE: Teeny Nukes

From: Chen-song Qin <cqin@e...>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 19:33:29 -0700
Subject: RE: Teeny Nukes

So what exactly is the point of micro nukes if you have conventional
munitions (HE, FAE, plasma?, electrical?) that are just as powerful as
them, but will leave no side-effects on your own occupying troops?

------------------------------------------------
A waist is a terrible thing to mind.
------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From:	Beth.Fulton@csiro.au [SMTP:Beth.Fulton@csiro.au]
Sent:	Monday, March 11, 2002 5:10 PM
To:	gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject:	RE: Teeny Nukes

G'day,

> According to The Book, the "average soldier" can throw 
> a grenade 35m effectively.  Now, that's 3.5" in Stargrunt terms,

But it's 17" or there abouts in FMA, so may be worth thinking about for
that
one... even if only as a "ludicrous option".

Cheers

Beth


Prev: Re: Re-entry: was FT: Carriers Next: [GZG-ECC] AARs now posted