RE: IJN/UNSC technology

In message
<E83E983C3EC9DD45A40B24C4BA3A60756AE9F6@col1smx01.USE.AD.DLA.MIL>
	  "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" <Brian.Bell@dscc.dla.mil> wrote:

[re-ordered]
> Oerjan Wrote
> > 
> > [snip]
> > 
> > Schoon wrote:
> > 
> > >...that with the new MASS they should be "massaged"
> > >so that they keep the 3xMASS point cost that the rest of the
weapons
> > >generally keep.
> > 
> > Err... weapons don't generally keep a 3xMASS points cost. Look in
FB2 for
> > several examples to the contrary :-/
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Oerjan
> > oerjan.ohlson@telia.com
> 
> True. But _HUMAN_ weapons do.
>  
> -----
> Brian Bell
> -----
>

Well, the official ones published so far...

I se no reason while a new 'cutting edge' human technology could not
have a cost of 4x (or possibly even 5x) the MASS - infact, I think I'd
prefer it.

Charles