Re: BREN/BAR THOUGHTS
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 14:28:59 -0500
Subject: Re: BREN/BAR THOUGHTS
At 9:09 AM -0600 3/2/02, DAWGFACE47@webtv.net wrote:
>THE BREN LMG BECAME RE CLASSIFIED AS A GPMG WHEN IT WAS RE CHAMBERED
>FOR 7.62MM AND MODIFIED TO USE A BELTED AMMO FEED!
The Bren was never converted to belted/linked ammo. There were some
trials versions done at Enfield of such a beast. But none were ever
issued. The 7.62 Brens that soldiered on after WWII were converted
largely from old stock .303 brens.
Also, note the Bren was a section weapon. Given a 10 man infantry
section, there were 3 guys on the bren with the lance corporal over
the bren group and a corpral over the full 10 man section.
So you had
1 Cpl with sten or other sub gun
6 pvts w/ SMLEs or No4's
1 LCpl with a SMLE/No4 and several bren mags
1 Pvt w/ a Bren, several mags and a parts wallet
1 Pvt w/ bren mags and spare barrel/parts roll
Supposedly the 7 man rifle group carried a few bren mags each as
well. If they could, everyone carried full sized shovels, Mills bombs
and other kit.
>(as i remember it; a tripod was introduced in addtion to the normal
>bipod to allow for this mission)
This was for the Sustained fire role as they called it. Not the same
class as the Vickers (which had 2 carriers/ gun and 4 men).
--
--
Ryan Gill | | rmgill@mindspring.com
| |
| O--=- |
|_/|o|_\_|
/ 00DA61 \
_w/|=_[__]_= \w_
|: O(4) == O :|
|---\________/---|
||\ /||
||=\______/=||
|| ||