Prev: Re: FT: Shipfigs, was Near-Topic: G forces Next: Re: Fusion energy was: SNOW JOB

Re: FT: Shipfigs, was Near-Topic: G forces

From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 10:36:46 -0800
Subject: Re: FT: Shipfigs, was Near-Topic: G forces

Thanks for the input.  I'm basically holing off on buying it until I
know a 
little more about the FT rules and can
decide what kind of ship/weapons it should be.

2B^2

>From: Michael Llaneza <maserati@earthlink.net>
>Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
>To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
>Subject: Re: FT: Shipfigs, was Near-Topic: G forces
>Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 10:18:18 -0800
>
>The Starblazers ships look real nice when painted. They do tend to run
a
>little small compared to the official FT ships, but that shouldn't be a
>major problem. They're a little tricky to assemble, you'll want a pin
>vise to help get the small metal pieces glued on.
>
>Brian Bilderback wrote:
>
>>Adam Benedict Canning wrote:
>>
>>>The Question becomes more what he thinks we'd pay for models of.
>>
>>
>>A few days ago, I saw a Starblazers figure in a local store, and was
>>wondering how well they fit with other ship figs, and what others
>>thought of them esthetically...
>>
>>2B^2
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
>>http://www.hotmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>

_________________________________________________________________


Prev: Re: FT: Shipfigs, was Near-Topic: G forces Next: Re: Fusion energy was: SNOW JOB