Next: OT: On keeping domesticated peeves as pets --> Re[2]: Colonists and Weapons

Re[2]: small carrier expense

From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:39:15 -0500
Subject: Re[2]: small carrier expense


At 11:14 AM -0500 1/29/02, Flak Magnet wrote:
>
>So, if FTL drives are cheap in "your game" then sure, there would be
>no practical use for system-defense specific vessels with no FTL
>capability.

Aside from the mass taken up by the FTL drive. That mass could be 
used for additional weapons, main drive thrust, fighters, what have 
you...

-- 
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill			     '01 Honda Insight -
- rmgill@mindspring.com 		 '76 Chevy Monte Carlo -
- ryan.gill@turner.com			       '72 Honda CB750 -
- www.mindspring.com/~rmgill	      '60 Daimler FV701H Mk2/3 -
-	      I speak not for CNN, nor they for me	       -
----------------------------------------------------------------
- C&R-FFL - /	Protect Freedom AND Security	  \	       -
-    NRA   /  http://www.indefenseoffreedom.org/   \ DoD #0780 -

Prev: Re: [OT] Some list def'n

Next: OT: On keeping domesticated peeves as pets --> Re[2]: Colonists and Weapons