Prev: RE: [ADMIN] codes Next: Re: COMMERCE RAIDER VS WARSHIP

Re: Re[3]: St Jon's remarks

From: "Don M" <dmaddox1@h...>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:18:41 -0600
Subject: Re: Re[3]: St Jon's remarks


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Flak Magnet <flakmagnet72@yahoo.com>
To: laserlight@quixnet.net <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:27 AM
Subject: Re[3]: St Jon's remarks

> I take great exception to the assertion that I'm a sinner.
> 
> Now, I would not argue for a moment that I'm a debauched purveyor of
> pleasures both petty and extravagant, preying upon other debauched and
> willing persons of the age of consent, but that's neither here nor
> there.  (I hope I left that vague enough to still get a PG-rating.)
> 
> In the future, please disclaim your statement of opinion with phrasing
> to the effect of it being such.  Your opinion, worth exactly what has
> been paid for it.
> 
> This retort has been brought to you Tongue in Cheek, because if the
> tongue was anywhere else, someone would be squealing, squirming, or
> both.
> 
Can I get an AMEN! ........Yep from me at least, great "Tongue in Cheek"
btw I found it very up lifting (although vague and PG rated lol) .
Besides 
a debauchery is grossly under rated and misunderstood activity....Don


Prev: RE: [ADMIN] codes Next: Re: COMMERCE RAIDER VS WARSHIP