Re: Merc Guild
From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <s_schoon@p...>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 10:45:50 -0800
Subject: Re: Merc Guild
On Thursday, January 3, 2002, at 10:27 AM, Don M wrote:
> All governments lie deniability is a must that will never change.As
for
> the
> equipment who is to say you supply them with your own. I can think of
> a few scenarios where say a NAC hired unit supplied with ESU arms
> attacks an FSE outpost, ensuring some get away.....Where did they get
> this equipment you ask? Off the battlefield or from third parties ect.
I think that the deniability issue is still a difficulty. Setting the
money tracking issue aside and concentrating on equipment:
Getting large quantities of another country's arms would probably be
traceable, and mercenaries would probably be looking for newer designs
rather than cheap knock-offs (i.e. M-4s instead of AK-47s).
While possession of the arms isn't positive proof, it's a pretty strong
indicator that may provoke action anyway.
Schoon