Re: S'V Seekers

> >  As a fan of MT missiles, I think they should not have secondary
movement
> > either.  deapite the AI it's a matter of an agile Bull moving in
for the
> > kill, not a ballerina moving in for a kiss.

Jaime said:
> I have to disagree. If a fighter can get a secondary movement so
could a
> missile of comperable design. If it's purely for game balance then
fine,
> it's not a great thing, but sometimes you have to make compromises,
but
> if you go by the PSB in the book they should act more like fighters
then
> they do.

Concur.  If a fighter gets a secondary move, then an AI-controlled
missile should too.  If anything, it should be more agile--not limited
by the pilot's ability to withstand maneuvering gees, and doesn't have