Prev: Re: Questions regarding NAC ground units, was SG IF morale Next: RE: Questions regarding NAC ground units, was SG IF morale

RE: [FH] Tedious Royalty Debate... Re: Questions regarding NAC ground units, was SG IF morale

From: Michael Brown <mwbrown@v...>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 19:27:39 -0800
Subject: RE: [FH] Tedious Royalty Debate... Re: Questions regarding NAC ground units, was SG IF morale

Though the Duke of Aksarben has a certain ring...

Michael Brown

-----Original Message-----
From:	devans@uneb.edu
Sent:	Sunday, December 02, 2001 1:57 PM
To:	gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject:	[FH] Tedious Royalty Debate... Re: Questions regarding
NAC ground 
units, was SG IF morale

***
>I have  SERIOUS doubts that Americans would EVER accept the imposition
of
nobility
> on American Culture.

Did someone say "Kennedy"?
***

I'd have to say Long or Rockefeller make better examples(my girlfriend
mentioned 'Bush' just to watch me shudder), but I'm ok with your cite
for
sheer national sweep, though short on generations. Also, there's a good
number of folk that say the American fascination with Diana, Princess of
Wales, could be attibuted to a wish for our own royalty. Dime store
psychology, but plenty fine for PS/H(istorical)B.

However, you can run it as you please; I have some problems with an
'Earl
of Nebraska' or 'Viscount of Lincoln' myself. Megan will STILL be a Dame
in
my fluff.

The_Beast


Prev: Re: Questions regarding NAC ground units, was SG IF morale Next: RE: Questions regarding NAC ground units, was SG IF morale