Prev: Re: [OT] Next: NBC Decontam team

Re: WotW #5 AFHAWKS

From: Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@m...>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:07:49 +1100
Subject: Re: WotW #5 AFHAWKS

G'day Bif,

 >Yes, but if we just kept the interceptor
 >pod rules we would need to increase
 >the mass of the weapon over the 1
 >mass I was after....

You can fix that by decreasing the range (to your 9" or 6" etc), without

any need for fiddling with the rest of the mechanic.

 >PS-The ignore heavy fighters bonus is
 >because I don`t care how heavly
 >armoured a fighter is, when hit by a
 >big enough warhead, it will go bang
 >just like any other <G>.

True, but if you argue that way you could justify the KV scatterpacks 
ignoring heavy bonus too and then what would be the point of all their 
fighters being heavy? Your opponent pays for them to be heavy, he should

get some advantage out of it....you could also argue your warhead isn't
big 
enough ;)

Beth

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Elizabeth Fulton
c/o CSIRO Division of Marine Research
GPO Box 1538
HOBART
TASMANIA 7001
AUSTRALIA
Phone (03) 6232 5018 International +61 3 6232 5018
Fax 03 6232 5053 International +61 3 6232 5053

email: beth.fulton@marine.csiro.au


Prev: Re: [OT] Next: NBC Decontam team