RE: Do you enforce Fleet "composition"

Hi 

Normally the group i play in splits its
fleets in the following manner.

2500 pt fleet of which 
1200 capitals BC anc above
800 cruisers CH - CL
500 escorts SC - DDH

Unless of course we have a specific scenario.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Ørlyng [mailto:andreas.orlyng@rikshospitalet.no]
Sent: 22 November 2001 13:58
To: GZG-L Mailinglist (E-post)
Subject: FT: Do you enforce Fleet "composition"

Gentlemen,

Do you enforce "fleet composition", meaning having to field a bunch of
different ships only.

We play _only_ with the ships from Fleet Book I & II and the
"reinforcements" from Star Rangers website
http://www.star-ranger.com/SRStuff.htm.

Tuesday night we played a 3000 vs 3000 pt game NAC/FSE vs Kra'Vak, never
having played NAC before and wanting to try out the pulse torpedoes I
took
with my share of the "allied" points.

 1 CH Vandenburg/T (2 PT)
 3 BB Vanguard (4 PT)

Which is slightly less than 1500 pts but it felt right for a heavy
battleship squadron.

Some of the non-playing persons that where present mumbled something
about
cheese, apparently they feelt that this wasnt "right"... 

Now being relatively new to FT, I have owned the books for years and
years
but only recently started playing. I am would like to know your "style",
do
you consider fieldig only cruisers and battleships "cheesy" shoud I
field a
bunch of DD's and FF's as well.

I should mention that the Kra'Vak player fielded a couple of Battleships
and
Battledreadnoughts of his own. And that the FSE player had a bunch of
light
ships.

YT

Andreas
--
Andreas Ørlyng 	 Mob: 450 02 395
mailto:andreas.orlyng@rikshospitalet.no