Prev: Re: [SG] Firing & actions Next: IAVRs

Re: [LST] Re: [SG] Firing & actions

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 18:44:52 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [LST] Re: [SG] Firing & actions


--- devans@uneb.edu wrote:
> 
> Yves said:
> ***
> I hope it's not the real intent of the rule or else
> all my troopers will
> need 2 riffles or more! (just kidding)
> ***
> 
> John said:
> ***
> You give soldiers multiple weapons to increase
> versatility, not firepower.  ie., a soldier with a
> rifle and a buzzbomb is capable of engaging tanks OR
> infantry.  Not both at the same time.  Shades of
> freakin' Rambo, running around with an M-60 in each
> hand.
> ***
> 
> Looks to me as if that's already been covered, John.
> Or, where does this
> fall in the 75/25% spectrum?
> 
> The_Beast
> 

Maybe I'm unusually dense, or those beers are kicking
my butt or something, but I have no idea what you're
talking about.

John

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals


Prev: Re: [SG] Firing & actions Next: IAVRs