RE: FT Taskforce and Fleet Actions
From: "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" <Brian.Bell@d...>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:31:56 -0400
Subject: RE: FT Taskforce and Fleet Actions
True, but from thier design philosophy, I always assumed the NSL was
primarily a home defense priority fleet anyway. For raiding or attacking
you
would need faster designs.
-----
Brian Bell
-----
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Gill [mailto:rmgill@mindspring.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 10:20
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: RE: FT Taskforce and Fleet Actions
[snip]
This [Jump distance base on MD rating] really really hamstrings the NSL
strategically. Tactical
movement seems disconnected (engine wise) from strategic movement.
--
- Ryan Montieth Gill DoD# 0780 (Smug #1) / AMA / SOHC -
- ryan.gill@SPAMturner.com I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
- rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com www.mindspring.com/~rmgill/ -