Prev: RE: FT Taskforce and Fleet Actions Next: Re: ADFC, Vector, SMs and Fighters...

RE: FT Taskforce and Fleet Actions

From: "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" <Brian.Bell@d...>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:31:56 -0400
Subject: RE: FT Taskforce and Fleet Actions

True, but from thier design philosophy, I always assumed the NSL was
primarily a home defense priority fleet anyway. For raiding or attacking
you
would need faster designs.

-----
Brian Bell
-----

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Gill [mailto:rmgill@mindspring.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 10:20
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: RE: FT Taskforce and Fleet Actions

[snip]

This [Jump distance base on MD rating] really really hamstrings the NSL
strategically. Tactical 
movement seems disconnected (engine wise) from strategic movement.

--
- Ryan Montieth Gill		DoD# 0780 (Smug #1) / AMA / SOHC -
- ryan.gill@SPAMturner.com  I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
- rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com	     www.mindspring.com/~rmgill/ -


Prev: RE: FT Taskforce and Fleet Actions Next: Re: ADFC, Vector, SMs and Fighters...