RE: ADFC, Vector, SMs and Fighters...

G'day, 

>The rule is the reduction of SM 
>attack range (3" rather than 6") when 
>using Vector movement over Cinematic 
>Movement. The extension I have 
>understood was that fighters were 
>covered under this.

Its not real clear, we never have and didn't even think of that
interpretation until very recently - not that we think its necessary
even
now.

>However, certain elements have 
>begun to argue that ADFC should also 
>be reduced to 3" under this rule. 

Nope, that'd make it useless. End points are more predictable in vector
the
actual ships tend to "jiggle position" more so the formations aren't as
tidy, thus you need to keep the 6" to have a useful system.

Cheers