Re: Rules Clarifications (new FAQ?)

David Griffin wrote:

> > >>It seems to me that something like this could be
> > >>done by GZG a little at a time. We could come up
> > >>with a mark you could put on a message, like
> > >>[RI] for Request Interpretation. Someone could
> > >>compile them for Jon,
> > >
> > >You have just volunteered for the job. Good luck
>
>In order to cut down on the workload for Jon
>I think I mentioned that person would have
>to have some official standing and it would
>also be a good idea for that person to have
>access to Jon . Somehow I don't think anyone
>would be happy with my rulings, nor should
>they. GZG must have tournament judges.

Laserlight had it right. You didn't volunteer to ANSWER the questions;
only 
to COMPILE them... No need for any "official standing" to do that.

Later,

Oerjan
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com

"Life is like a sewer.
  What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
-Hen3ry