Re: NIFT Stealth II Trial AAR
From: Charles Taylor <charles.taylor@c...>
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 13:20:47 +0100
Subject: Re: NIFT Stealth II Trial AAR
In message <firstname.lastname@example.org>
John Leary <email@example.com> wrote:
> --- Laserlight <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > I can see Stealth being a threshold-able item, but I
> > can't quite see
> > repairing it--at least, not on a tactical time
> > scale.
> I would agree if the 'stealth' were a system
> (or 2), much like thrust is handled.
> I would prefer to see the 'stealth' as a
> attribute of construction/materials and have
> it 'worn way'/reduced due to the damage accumulation
> (at thresholds). (I.E. a stealth ship looses the
> first level at the end of the second row of
> damage, and the second level at the end of
> the third row of damage.)
> Bye for now,
> John L.
I agree, and a similar methodology could be applied to aerodynamic
Hmm.. what about combined Stealth/Aerodynamics?