Prev: Re: [FT] Military Overcharging Next: RE: [FT] Military Overcharging

RE: [FT] Military Overcharging

From: "Brian Bell" <bbell1@i...>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 20:20:28 -0400
Subject: RE: [FT] Military Overcharging

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I am dropping off this thread, as we (myself included) have taken it
W-A-Y off topic.

- ---
Brian Bell
bbell1@insight.rr.com
ICQ: 12848051
AIM: Rlyehable
YIM: Rlyehable
The Full Thrust Ship Registry:
http://www.ftsr.org
- ---


- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of
aebrain@austarmetro.com.au
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2893 18:44
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [FT] Military Overcharging

[snip] 
>The standard, itself, was over 200 pages (in 3 parts). 

Been there, done that.

[snip]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBO0EPy9OVrCdNYgyBEQLEegCg9Skqm7sBmfTAHRfXS9CWmT+5BDYAn20e
UUuLfiEpF63nCMu0G+JpIo3l
=3mRS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Prev: Re: [FT] Military Overcharging Next: RE: [FT] Military Overcharging