RE: Questions re Fighters

I would have him reread the section carefully. As it discusses splitting
your fire between multiple enemy groups, it is difficult to argure for 2
or
more.

Plus if you define it as 2 or more the term 'Multiple' becomes redundant
as
it would be difficult to have a dogfight with just 1 group.

-----
Brian Bell
-----

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Griffin [SMTP:carbon_dragon@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 3:23 PM
> To:	gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject:	RE: Questions re Fighters
> 
> 
> --- Brian Bell <bbell1@insight.rr.com> wrote:
> >  
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > One on one dogfights are handled in FT 2nd edition
> > p. 17 (also covers
> > rules for leaving a dogfight).
> > 
> > Multiple group dogfights are handled in Fleet Book 1
> > p. 6.
> > 
> At least one member of my group interprets multiple
> group as being 2 or more, thus overriding the 
> one on one dogfight rules. Has GZG ever officially
> said one way or the other?
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/