Prev: RE: [FT]Star Trek rules? Next: RE: [FT]Star Trek rules?

Re: [FT]Star Trek rules?

From: "Don M" <dmaddox1@h...>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:26:40 -0700
Subject: Re: [FT]Star Trek rules?


>David,
> 
> I did too, except in a couple of cases (Voyager
> and the Defiant, though even for these they are
> actually bigger ships in class then I would have
> made them at first). Which ships do you find out
> of scale?
> 
>In my fleet the micromachines Enterprise Ds I use
> as Destroyer Escorts , the Excelsiors were used
>as Lt Carriers and the Enterprise Bs as Battlecruisers,
>Ambassador as Escortcruisers, Sovereigns as Heavy
>Cruisers X, Voyager as Fast Cruisers.
>The main thing that I did was to match up the ships
>with the SFB size models and go from there.A lot
>of it was of course a matter of taste I also added
> new types of ships not covered by anyone before
> FT like invasion craft (die cast Droid Ship from 
>Star Wars painted in the same egg shell bluegray
> as the rest of my Feds used as a LSD) useful for
>those FT Dirtside interface games.
>
>
>
> The small Enterprise E's have
> been sovereign class battleships up to now. Now that
> I have a big sovereign mini, 
>
> I don't have that one yet, does look good.

>I'll probably change the
> name of the battleship and use Sovereign for the 
> explorer class (in 300mass range).
> 
>  
> I'd like to see these scratchbuilds. I bought a
> bunch of scratchbuilds from a guy on ebay and
> some of them are quite neat.
> 
> I'll get around to scanning all my stuff in one of these
> days and set up a web page lol.
>
>
>
> There's a guy in our group who has the Klingons spec'd
> like he likes them and he plays them all the time. 
> They aren't overarmed but they are VERY tough to
> destroy.
> 
> Yes they are a fun bunch in fact most of my conversions
> and scratchbuilds are in that fleet to include a Super Carrier .

> > I'd like to see them when you're done.
> Sure thing I'll send them to you off list when
> I get them done.
>
>Don


Prev: RE: [FT]Star Trek rules? Next: RE: [FT]Star Trek rules?