Prev: Fighters, Canadians, and GZG-ECC CanAm Next: RE: [OT] What makes a good miniatures web site

Re: [semi-OT] Fighters and ST Re: FT-Fighters and launch bays

From: Michael Llaneza <maserati@s...>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 17:24 -0700
Subject: Re: [semi-OT] Fighters and ST Re: FT-Fighters and launch bays

The Dominion War Sourcebook explicitly mentions fighters, that's on
TrekRPG.net. It's supported by pdf's of the ship combat games.

> ------------ Original Message -----------
> From: devans@uneb.edu <devans@uneb.edu>
> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 18:28:14 -0500
> 
> 
> I thought the Kzin were more dependent on drones than fighters;
Hydrans
> more so on fighters, but not overwhelmingly. Certainly seemed to be
Cole's
> point of view from what I've read. A big YMMV, of course.
> 
> I seem to recall in TNG time frame that fighters were mentioned mainly
in
> Wesley's disgrace at academy (or were they referred to as shuttles?).
The
> smallest ships I noticed at the assault on Tarok Noir(sp?) were the
same
> design as the Maquis ship in the beginning of Voyager, and I think the
Jem
> Ha'dar ships were even referred to as 'fighters'. Scout-Corvette
sounds
> right.
> 
> I prefer toned-down, or very expensive, fighters or any kind of
missles,
> but most of my FT-ing tends toward slow, and my 'vision' is more
toward
> black-iron navies.
> 
> The_Beast
> 
> -Douglas J. Evans, curmudgeon
> 
> One World, one Web, one Program - Microsoft promotional ad
> Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer - Adolf Hitler
> 


Prev: Fighters, Canadians, and GZG-ECC CanAm Next: RE: [OT] What makes a good miniatures web site