RE: Maritime Strike Bombers
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 19:51:57 +0200
Subject: RE: Maritime Strike Bombers
Ryan Gill wrote:
>>Shipboard, SML salvoes and MT missiles are 2 mass on their own, so if
you
>>want a fighter capable of delivering the full shipboard effect, your
fighter
>>is going to need to be 3-4 mass (which defeats the purpose of
fighters).
>>It's cheaper to send in a missile destroyer with SMRs/MT missiles once
you
>>get into these mass / costs (plus the added benefits of FTL).
>
>Well, there isn't a need for magazines, handling gear and all the
armoured
>box stuff that they need shipboard.
Don't look at the *SM*-ER. You have to look at the *SMR*-ER, since
that's
what your bomber is launching - it includes the mass of the hardpoints,
which your bomber certainly does need (unless it uses duct tape to
secure
the missiles <g>). Similarly the MTMs include the Mass of their
hardpoints.
A single ship-board SMR-ER is Mass 5 and costs 15. This Mass does not
include magazines or handling gear; but it *does* include the hardpoints
-
which the bomber needs too. Two MTMs including hardpoints is Mass 4 and
costs 12.
IOW, unless you meant for the entire bomber squadron to have a total
payload of 1 SMR-ER or 2 MTMs, the ship-mounted *weapon* alone - without
the ship to carry it to the battle - costs more than your entire
*bomber*
(including missiles) :-/
In another post Ryan wrote:
>Hmm... given that torp fighters are size 1 and carry a single shot mass
4
>weapon.
No, they don't carry "a single shot mass 4 weapon". They carry a
single-shot weapon with similar damage and *one-fifth the range* of a
mass
4 *multi-shot* weapon. Saying that the torp fighter weapon is the same
as a
P-torp is similar to saying that an 120mm tank round is the same as the
more-than-5-meter long tank gun which fires it, plus its magazine :-/
Your bombers do seem to launch the full-sized ship missiles though,
since
they have the same range as the originals.
>Compare what is needed to fire a Harpoon from the air with what they
use
>on the ground. Also the ground based missiles usually need a booster.
But in this case you're comparing launching a missile from the air with
launching it from the ground. A more relevant comparison is between
launching a cruise missile from a big flying aircraft and launching the
same cruise missile from a smaller flying aircraft.
Regards,
Oerjan
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com
"Life is like a sewer.
What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."