Re: Sensors
From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 00:19:36 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Sensors
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Richard and Emily Bell wrote:
> The nature of shipbuilding makes it impossible for two vessels of the
same
> class to be identical, and often minor improvements are worked into
the design
> as it is built. The chaotic nature of turbulence also has a hand
here, so two
> nominally identical hulls will have similar, but distinctive
flownoises.
> Distinguishing between two passive contacts is not that difficult (not
that it
> is easy), and a tape library of previous encounters enables the
listener to
> identify a specific vessel. Combine this with some other intelligence
(Sonar
> profile SN7 just went into port, and simultaneous pic of the Seawolf),
and
> passive sonar can tell you exactly which vessel has been encountered.
>
> ESM will give a list of operating active sensors, this list is much
like a DNA
> test, in that it does not tell you which vessel, but does allow you to
rule
> some out. Detecting an active SPY-1 informs you that the blip is an
area air
> defence vessel, with SM2-MR missiles, aplenty. Not detecting an SPY-1
radar
> may simply mean that it is off.
Similarly, it's about impossible to rebuild EXACTLY the same frequency
control unit for a new radar etc. So sufficiently advanced ESM should be
able to tell you WHICH SPY-1 that is, once you have identified it
before... And assuming it's switched on.
Cheers,
Derk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine
iD8DBQE7FCB8JXH58oo6ncURAi5JAJ94dd5k63M0j+p1oU455sU2sUe9ngCdHSIj
TCNZV98SFnhu1BeeNob18Vk=
=+TTi