FT-Narc beacons and other electronics

I thought I`d put this on list for discusion, even though it should be a
WotW.

Narc targeting beacon.
Fired from a sml launcher, with a mass of 2 but a range of 36 mu (got to
have some advantages for no warhead). Fired just like a sml, including
pds.
If any missiles suvive, they lock a magnetic (or whatever) homing beacon
onto the targeted ships hull. These beacons all have a different
frequency,
allowing several to be used at once. When a sml round is fired at a
target
with one of these beacons on it, the sml`s can bypass any bansai missile
sponges and also gain a +1 on the number of missiles to hit roll (max
still
6). The cost of this system I would place at x4 mass, and any sml`s with
the
homing warheads also cost x3 mass +1 (ie, 7 points Vs 6 for a normal
range
sml). Of course, this would require more record keeping, but not that
much.
The beacons on the hull could be removed by DCP`s, but how should this
be
done, due to the hull of a warship in combat would be very hazardous to
your
health (rathere a understatement). I would say a DCP removes the beacon
on a
6, and the DCP dies on a roll of 1. This would remove 1 beacon, because
they
may be more than 1 beacon upon the hull (requiring multipul rolls,
hensemore
chance of casualties to the DCP`s). This one requires thought (ie-help,
I
can`t decide how to ballance this).

Jamming/decoy missiles.
These would replace the warhead with a electronics package designed to
blind/jam the sensors/pds of it`s target. Avalible in both sml and MT
missile versions. When fired, this missile jams the pds of it`s target
and
any adfcon/pds tied to it. The missile must be targetted and destroyed
first, before any other missiles can be engauged by the defences. The
pds
must be allocated to each salvo (sml) or missile (MT) including the
jammer(s). If the pds doesn`t destroy the jammer, the other pds cannot
engauge/destroy the other missiles incoming. This I would give the same
mass
and performance as the equivalent missiles, but the cost would be higher
because of the electronics involved (say, x5 mass?). Just a rough idea
at
the moment. Works better with MT missiles, due to each missile being a
separate missile instead of a salvo (or you could roll the number of
sml`s
on target, that is the number of jammers to be intercepted).

Decoys.
A decoy would be lauched at the begining of the turn, and the ship would
move acording to it`s written orders (but the enemy not seeing them).
The
decoy(s) would also be moved from the starting point just like a ship,
and
would be displayed on the board identical to the real ship. This would
force
the enemy to split his fire. The decoys would die at the first shot. My
feeling is to allow them 3 turns endurance, due to the high power
requirements to emit a ships electronic signiture to fool the enemy
sensors.
Mass 4, cost 20. Another rough idea (thinking of the goast rider decoy
missiles in HH).

BIF
 "yorkshire born,yorkshire bred,
 strong in arms, thick in head"