Re: Close Assaullt

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Jaime Tiampo wrote:

> Brian Burger wrote:
> 
> > God, it was nice to see the PA do it's thing properly, for once. The
fact
> > that you let them get well behind you didn't help you any, of
course.
> 
> I'm still iffy on that close assulting without line of sight.

Ooo. I remember a BIG discussion on that. Now, the rules as I read them,
say you can close assault a position. E.g. a piece of geography. So you
wouldn't have to have seen the enemy, but could be given orders like
'take that patch of wood by close assault' and rush into, and through
the
trees, assaulting whomever you run into first. Of course, my opponents
disagreed vehemently.

What's the consensus here, can you:

... close assault a well defined piece of geography, even if you can not
see all of it (e.g. far end of the patch of woods; the final planned
destination of the close assault move), but ARE aware of enemy
presence in those woods?

... close assault a well defined piece of geography, even if you can not
see all of it (e.g. far end of the patch of woods; the final planned
destination of the close assault move), but are NOT aware of enemy
presence in those woods?

Cheers,

   Derk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine

iD8DBQE6zD6WJXH58oo6ncURAjYTAJ9iwgrKwenXvJo9bpT/BKrTAYiDyQCgu1MF
DpmKSiMxfTDKpxiL13MHafk=
=/gjw