Prev: re: Re: Fleet Escorts Next: re: Chit-based FT? Re: Fleet Escorts

Re: Command Reactivations

From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 23:18:40 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Command Reactivations

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Roger Books wrote:

> On 28-Mar-01 at 15:19, Derk Groeneveld (derk@cistron.nl) wrote:
> 
> > I think the statement should be a bit more explicit in that each
> > additional activiation will have to be made by a leader a level
higher up 
> > (e.g. not 2x by platoon leader, 1x by company leader, and none by
> > battalian leader)
> 
> Won't work.  platoon leader activates 2 squads.
> company leader activates platoon leader.
>   Platoon leader cannot activate the 2 squads because he has
>   done so once before.

Yes, so THAT statement needs to be there explicitly?

Cheers,

  Derk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine

iD8DBQE6wlU0JXH58oo6ncURAlj1AKDh0YO0TnQ0Bla/CXLfJQMU5QsI+QCglBrT
fbhAqdG+qJOSgajPfdwqT6Q=
=VsOE


Prev: re: Re: Fleet Escorts Next: re: Chit-based FT? Re: Fleet Escorts