Prev: Re: SG2 - what's it like? Next: RE: SG2- Like it?

RE: [SG2] Claymores discouraging close assaults?

From: "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" <Brian.Bell@d...>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:44:21 -0500
Subject: RE: [SG2] Claymores discouraging close assaults?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mark.langsdorf@amd.com [SMTP:mark.langsdorf@amd.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 10:36 AM
> To:	gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject:	[SG2] Claymores discouraging close assaults?
> 
[snip].  

>	Final question, related to the incident: Can an
> unactivated unit use reaction fire against a close assaulting
> unit that needs two combat moves to get to the target
> unit?  My command squad was unactivated and had a good view
> of the action, and it seems to me they should have been able
> to fire upon the PA as it charged.  Of course, this didn't
> occur to me until afterwards, and again, I don't know if the
> rules support this.
> 
> -Mark Langsdorf
-----End Original Message-----

I had this question also. And if reaction fire (or overwatch fire if
using
those house rules) is allowed, what would be the result of
suppression/casualties on the assaulting force?

---
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net


Prev: Re: SG2 - what's it like? Next: RE: SG2- Like it?