Prev: Favorite Campaign Format - A question? Next: Re: [FT] Self-Playtesting Scenarios

Powered Armor!

From: Nyrath the nearly wise <nyrath@c...>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:41:50 -0500
Subject: Powered Armor!

http://www.wirednews.com/news/technology/0,1282,41216,00.html
From - Thu Jan 25 13:47:27 2001
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
	by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA22015;
	Wed, 24 Jan 2001 17:14:32 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
	by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
f0ONDfS93735;
	Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:13:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 24 Jan
2001 15:13:39 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f0ONDcP93713
	for gzg-l-outgoing; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:13:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:oCGOmh9+cYLtHckzw9IKXQNf0v4XTjWB@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52] (may be forged))
	by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f0ONDan93708
	for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:13:36
-0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp2.quixnet.net (psmtp2.array3.laserlink.net
[63.65.123.52] (may be forged))
	by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
f0ONDak58410
	for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:13:36 -0800
(PST)
	(envelope-from laserlight@quixnet.net)
Received: from pavilion (1Cust116.tnt15.princess-anne.va.da.uu.net
[63.14.252.116])
	by smtp2.quixnet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA29444
	for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 18:13:30 -0500
(EST)
Message-ID: <001a01c08674$21c71f40$74fc0e3f@pavilion>
From: "Laserlight" <laserlight@quixnet.net>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
References: <200101221935.f0MJZVW79060@io.frii.com>
<p04320401b692581a0a8b@[63.202.82.107]> <3A6CBB97.A2C26BAF@mta.ca>
Subject: [OT] Delta V
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 18:11:15 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000f2b
Status: RO
Content-Length: 74
Lines: 2

http://www.adastragames.com/dv

Anyone with experience, comments, reviews?
From - Thu Jan 25 13:47:29 2001
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
	by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA17662;
	Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:55:22 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
	by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
f0P2qa198157;
	Wed, 24 Jan 2001 18:52:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 24 Jan
2001 18:52:34 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f0P2qXa98136
	for gzg-l-outgoing; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 18:52:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:w9C47DK3yX22FXYwLaTwPgJ+G02K7+WJ@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52] (may be forged))
	by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f0P2qVn98131
	for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 18:52:31
-0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.email.msn.com (cpimssmtpu08.email.msn.com
[207.46.181.30])
	by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
f0P2qVk96130
	for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 18:52:31 -0800
(PST)
	(envelope-from peter_mancini@email.msn.com)
Received: from beaconhill - 32.102.115.113 by email.msn.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Wed, 24 Jan 2001 18:52:24 -0800
Message-ID: <002a01c08679$d81fc760$71736620@beaconhill>
From: "Peter Mancini" <peter_mancini@email.msn.com>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
References: <p0432040fb6952c9cccec@[63.202.83.21]>
Subject: Re: [FT] Self-Playtesting Scenarios
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 21:52:22 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000f2f
Status: RO
Content-Length: 382
Lines: 9

Um, what is the GEV defense???

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sean Bayan Schoonmaker" <s_schoon@pacbell.net>
> one side to win. Avoid this at all costs. Remember, the closer you 
> get to a tie, the better balanced your scenario. If you have time, 
> try STUPID things; if they work, you need to rethink things (after 
> all, this is how the GEV defense in OGRE was born!).

Prev: Favorite Campaign Format - A question? Next: Re: [FT] Self-Playtesting Scenarios