Prev: Re: [CON] East Coast Convention IV - Eight weeks to go Next: Re: [FT] AAR and Re: RE-[FT] Starfire...

Re: RE-[FT]FB3

From: ShldWulf@a...
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:08:55 EST
Subject: Re: RE-[FT]FB3

In a message dated 12/30/00 6:24:57 AM Mountain Standard Time, 
bif@bifsmith.fsnet.co.uk writes:

<< Also, how about different warheads? We have needle, emp and nuke
 warheads, so how about a X-RAY laser nuclear detonation powered beam
warhead
 (I know this was tried with little sucess in some underground
detonations
 (or so they say), but there is no physics reason for it not to work in
the
 future).   >>

FYI on the Detonation warheads. They WILL fire in the "aft" arc no
matter if 
thrust is used or not. The nature of the beast is that there is a forest
of 
laser rods around the warhead and the "beams" are fired in ALL
directions in 
the mico-second before the explosion destroys them.

(i.e.: No "aiming" at all :o)

One good reason NOT to deploy them when friendlies are in the
neighborhood.

They would probably act more like SML's than anything else.

Prev: Re: [CON] East Coast Convention IV - Eight weeks to go Next: Re: [FT] AAR and Re: RE-[FT] Starfire...