Re: FMA Skirmish Questions

>In message
<417DEC289A05D4118408000102362E0A34D346@host-253.bitheads.com>,
>"Bar
>clay, Tom" writes:
>>
>> number of thoughts about rules not written or features that are
missing
>> (HEY, I'M NOT COMPLAINING - it's a beta and it was only 14 pages!).
But I'll
>> work those into another email later.
>
>Whoa!	I wondered WTF you were talking about.	Did this document come
>across here and I miss it, or has playtest started on an actual
>document we (the unwashed plebes) don't have access to?

It was posted to the main list a while back, I'm sure someone will have
forwarded it to you by now!
One point for everyone who has a copy to note: it's not really even a
Beta
- more a collection of alpha thoughts, cobbled together from various
testing drafts produced over a period of a couple of years! Hence there
ARE
bits that don't fit with other bits, bits that don't make sense, bits
that
seem to refer to other bits that aren't there, etc, etc.... it certainly
isn't even a complete playtest draft, and was never meant to be - it was
just intended as a "first glimpse" of work-in-progress, and to generate
some reactions and feedback from the list (which it certainly has done,
and
many of the comments will shape the way it evolves towards a publishable
product).

Jon (GZG)