RE: [FT] Wave Gun (was: OU & IC & FB3)

I misread what you intended. I thought that 
you meant the area of coverage would be the 
entire front arc (60 degrees).

Now I see that you meant to have the regular
cone, but have the long axis of the cone to
be anywhere in the front arc.

-----
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net	 
-----

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Mancini [SMTP:peter_mancini@msn.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 10:37 AM
> To:	gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject:	RE: [FT] Wave Gun (was: OU & IC & FB3)
> 
> >From: "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" <Brian.Bell@dscc.dla.mil>
> >You have the arc WAY too wide for the current wave gun. It is 2mu
> >wide for the first 12mu, 3mu for the 2nd, and 4mu wide for the 3rd.
> 
> How is that any different than what I wrote?
> >>Range 36" (progressive area, 2",3",4" for each 12 inches)
> Other than the fact that " should be mu as per Fleet Book 2.
> 
[snip].