Prev: Re: NSL vs KV, was Re: [Ft} OU & IC & FB3 Next: Re: Gravitics was Re: Suggestions and Advice Solicited!

RE: [FT] Defending with SMLs

From: "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" <Brian.Bell@d...>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 08:22:12 -0500
Subject: RE: [FT] Defending with SMLs

If you wish to use FSE ships without using the Salvo Missiles (for
simplicity), you are welcome to use the PAU ships from the Full Thrust
Ship
Registry (http://www.ftsr.org/ft/ft25/gov.asp#pau). The PAU ships I
designed
use FSE hulls, but replace disposable ordinance weapons (missiles) with
beam
weapons.

-----
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net	
http://www.ftsr.org
-----

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan [SMTP:Nathan_at_Spring_Grove_UK@email.msn.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 01, 2001 1:08 PM
> To:	gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject:	Re: [FT] Defending with SMLs
> 
> From: John Crimmins <johncrim@voicenet.com>
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
> Date: Monday, January 01, 2001 04:30
> Subject: [FT] Defending with SMLs
> 
> 
[snip]

> > I've been considering replacing the SML launchers with a class
> > one battery and three class twos (three arcs each).
> 
> > Are the (inexperienced) defenders likely to have a problem?
> 
> Make the change. Missiles require practice to to be handled properly
> at the both the sending and receiving ends, and you will get erratic
> results until your (inexperienced) players get some practice.
> 
[snip]

> Nathan
> 
> 


Prev: Re: NSL vs KV, was Re: [Ft} OU & IC & FB3 Next: Re: Gravitics was Re: Suggestions and Advice Solicited!