[FT] Defending with SMLs
From: John Crimmins <johncrim@v...>
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 11:31:34 -0500
Subject: [FT] Defending with SMLs
I'm preparing a big FT scenario to run with my gaming group -- the first
time we'll have used the Fleet Book rules -- and I need some input.
The attackers are stock NSL ships -- my largest fleet. The defenders
are a
mixture of NAC, ESU (maybe armed with a Heavy Beam Weapon or two; I
haven't
decided yet) and FSE -- my second largest fleet. Basically, the
defenders
are going to need to get some refugee ships off the attacker's board
edge,
and the attackers need to prevent this.
I mentioned the "escort" rules that I intend to use in a post a while
back;
short form is that escorting ships will be able to interpose themselves
between their charge and a single attacking ship.
All-in-all, pretty straightforward. But...about 50% of the defending
force
is FSE. Armed with lots and lots of SMLs. I have no experience gaming
with this weapon system, and I'm not sure if it is entirely suited for a
defending force. I have about half a dozen Trieste class DHs; I've been
considering replacing the SML launcher (with two salvos) with a class
one
battery and three class twos (three arcs each). This would give a total
of
two class ones and four class twos, and would seem to make it better
suited
for escort duty. I don't want to redesign the entire FSE force, though.
Are the (inexperienced) defenders likely to have a problem? If nothing
else, they will probably be out of missiles after the third turn, and
since
there's going to be close to a hundred ships on the table the game is
likely to last for a while. My players DO prefer relatively slow
velocities -- 12" is considered to be dangerously fast in one of our
games
-- and I'll be using asteroids to encourage this, so the SMLs should
have a
good chance of hitting.