Prev: Re: Rackham, not AA? Re: [SG] How about this? Next: Re: [FMA - possibly SG2/DS2] spotted/observed rules concept

Re: Oerjan Ohlson's Wet Dreams

From: Tony Christney <tchristney@h...>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 20:12:00 -0800
Subject: Re: Oerjan Ohlson's Wet Dreams

"Not very sporting." Like the horrendous "Uncouth-boats" of WWI and
WWII.
Another that comes to mind is Richard Simmons.
>  >
>>IIRC it's also considered an "inhumane weapon", whatever *that* is :-/
>>
>>Later,
>>
>>Oerjan Ohlson
>>oerjan.ohlson@telia.com
>
>Definition of 'inhumane' - something the other guy thoought of that
works
>TOO D___ well,  is used on your side by their side, and something a
>politiican a million miles away from combat is afraid is 'horrorific
>appearing' (like a gunshot wound isn't?) so you can't use it back.  Or
at
>least shouldn't get caught doing so.
>
>Gracias, Triphibious/Glenn (first war game played 1959)
>Triphibious Marines = Nektons.
>Not all Frogs are French, or even Human!
>Nektons, be all the Marine you can be!
>Resistance is EVERYTHING!
>
>________________________________________________________________
>YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
>Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
>Try it today - there's no risk!  For your FREE software, visit:
>http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

-- 

Tony Christney

Prev: Re: Rackham, not AA? Re: [SG] How about this? Next: Re: [FMA - possibly SG2/DS2] spotted/observed rules concept