Prev: Re: Vertical Damage (was: [FT] nasty idea for spinal mounts) Next: Re: Beth's latest poll

RE: Vertical Damage (was: [FT] nasty idea for spinal mounts)

From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 08:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: RE: Vertical Damage (was: [FT] nasty idea for spinal mounts)

> My comments marked by [Bri]
> 
> One last comment: If a verticle damage system is
> used I would suggest that
> the threshold checks are made at 6 (that is system
> is lost only on a 6).
> This would temper the weapon somewhat.
> 
> ---
> Brian Bell

     To expand slightly on Brians comments:
If using Core system rules, the vertical piercing
weapon could cause a threshold check on the 
core systems on a 6 only.

Bye for now,
John L.


Prev: Re: Vertical Damage (was: [FT] nasty idea for spinal mounts) Next: Re: Beth's latest poll