Re: [FT] was Scenario for Review, now Escorting
From: "Chris DeBoe" <LASERLIGHT@Q...>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 12:49:32 -0400
Subject: Re: [FT] was Scenario for Review, now Escorting
> My worry is that with a net reduction, you could build pairs of ships,
> one with shields, and one without. Then have the shielded ship escort
> the unshielded one. Attacks the the shielded ship are as normal.
> Attacks on the un shielded ship end up doing net damage equal to about
> level 0.5 shields. So its the better target, but you get a net
> increase in mass available for weapons with no loss. Or you're
> getting level 0.5 shields for free. Thats what worries me.
Suggestions:
a) The escortee can't shoot at any target in the escort's arc.
b) Compare the escortee's size to the escort. Split the dice before
rolling
to reflect the ratio, or determine a ratio and roll a die to decide
where it
hits. When in doubt, hit the escort. Eg: 20 mass FF escorts 100 mass
merchant. Attack by 7d of beams and 1 PTorp. FF eats 2 beam dice and
catches the torp if 1d6 results in a 6.
> I think doing not more damage is acceptable, as the civi ship takes
> less damage than it should, and the military ship ends up taking less
> damage than if it was targeted directly. I just worry that if there
> isn't a down-side to this escorting, military ships will do it to each
> other, and not just to merchants in a time of need.
>
> -=- Matthew L. Seidl email: seidl@cs.colorado.edu =-=
> =-= Graduate Student Project . . . What Project? -=-
> -=- http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~seidl/Home.html -Morrow
Quotes
=-=
> =-=
idl/lawsuit -=-
>