Re: [OT] Bureau of Relocation
From: Brian Quirt <baqrt@m...>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 00:36:07 -0400
Subject: Re: [OT] Bureau of Relocation
Roger Books wrote:
>
> I've been thinking a bit about this, the planet to orbit is trivial
> in the published universe. Why?
>
> Well, lets see, we have antigravity. If it is sturdy enough to be
> used in a tank it will be used in the civilian world.
>
> With antigravity you can basicly turn electricity into height. Let's
> see, the formula for potential energy is: mgh (IIRC).
>
> So, assume each colonist needs 10 (metric) tons of gear to get started
> and we need to lift it to, oh, say 100Km. That would be:
Well, we have a first problem with this: this material is NOT
now at
orbital velocity. In order to get it there, it needs to be moving fairly
fast. Now, I suppose you can leave your anti-gravity on, but eventually
you'll have to MOVE the stuff, and I presume that antigrav drains some
power.
> 1E6m * 10m/sec2 * 1E4Kg, or about 1E11J A Joule is 1Watt/Second
>
> 1E11/3.6E6 = 2.8Kw-Hours. Even assuming 10% efficiency that's still
> only 28Kw hours to orbit.
>
> Roger (Feel free to check my math, I haven't done this since
> my last Physics class years ago and may have made a mistake.)
I see only one problem. 1e11/3.6e6 = 2.8e4kW-hours, or 28
megawatt
hours. Not a math problem, just a division problem. At 10% efficiency,
that gives us a power consumption of 280 MW-hours, which is (IMO) fairly
large.
-Brian Quirt