Prev: Re: Indonesian Commonwealth[Long-ish] Next: Re: Starfire campaign

Re: (FT) Re: Simple Sensors III

From: Roger Books <books@m...>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 08:33:43 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: (FT) Re: Simple Sensors III

On  1-May-00 at 22:14, Roger Books (books@mail.state.fl.us) wrote:
> GBailey@aol.com wrote:
> > 
> > >Range (Info):    24"   48" 72" 96" 120"
> > >Class 0 Passive	All MASS    Bogey   None    None
> > >Class 0 Active All All MASS    Bogey   None
> > 
> > I think the ranges are too great.  What's the point of a Bogey if
> > by the time ships got within firing range you knew what is or isn't
> > a false ship reading?
> 
> I'll field this one.	These ranges are entirely appropriate if
> you are playing on an artificially small playing area.  If your
	 ^
	NOT
> playing area is large  either because you are doing PBeM or
> you are playing centimeters (or your table is very large) these
> ranges give the required tactal uncertanty needed.  Play a game
> where the lowest speed is 30 and you will have a whole new take
> on the game.
> 

ARgh.

Roger


Prev: Re: Indonesian Commonwealth[Long-ish] Next: Re: Starfire campaign