RE: [FT] ANOTHER FB Question of St Jon

This came up in a PBeM game that I am running. 
Someone had Class-6 Beams (max range 72").

I made a house rule that active sensors had a range equal to the
longest,
direct fire, weapon. But I kept passive sensors at 36 for
identification. It
seemed to work well.

I figure the cost/mass for larger sensors was incorporated into the cost
of
the larger weapon.

-----
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net	  
-----

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Denny Graver-Elstree [SMTP:denny.graver@bbc.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 11:09 AM
> To:	'gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU'
> Subject:	[FT] ANOTHER FB Question of St Jon
> 
> Now the SaVasku can fire officially in excess of the 54" currently
granted
> to human sensors, is there any official word on how they manage to
sense
> their targets ?
> Have the sensor rules been unofficially changed ?
> 
> :Denny
> 
> This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received
it
> in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose
the
> information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of
this
> message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC,
> unless specifically stated.